Former Vice President Al Gore in his home office in Nashville, TN. (Time magazine)
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- All Posts
Syndication: 
Get Angry - Take Action February 8, 2010 : 8:12 PM
John Kerry recently told climate bill supporters:
"I want you to go out there and start knocking on doors and telling people this has to happen," Kerry said during a conference hosted by labor, farming, military veteran and environmental groups. "You know if the Tea Party folks can go out there and get angry because they think their taxes are too high, for God's sake, a lot of citizens ought to get angry about the fact that they're being killed and our planet is being injured by what's happening on a daily basis by the way we provide our power and our fuel and the old practices we have. That's something worth getting angry about."
We can’t only get angry – we need to let the Senate know that inaction is simply not an option. A great way to spread that message is by adding your voice to the Repower Will by clicking here.
Miliband Fights Back February 8, 2010 : 3:56 PM
Ed Miliband, the U.K. Climate Secretary, had some tough words for climate crisis deniers:
"Miliband declared a "battle" against the "siren voices" who denied global warming was real or caused by humans, or that there was a need to cut carbon emissions to tackle it."
"It's right that there's rigour applied to all the reports about climate change, but I think it would be wrong that when a mistake is made it's somehow used to undermine the overwhelming picture that's there," he said.
"We know there's a physical effect of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere leading to higher temperatures, that's a question of physics; we know CO2 concentrations are at their highest for 6,000 years; we know there are observed increases in temperatures; and we know there are observed effects that point to the existence of human-made climate change. That's what the vast majority of scientists tell us."
Deniers have been grasping at straws, attempting to make the case that there is no climate crisis. But the evidence is simply too overwhelming. As we learned a few weeks ago, 2000-2009 was the warmest decade on record.
The fact is, the media has been complicit in these efforts, often giving equal voice to those attempting to distort the truth for political or financial gain. Ed Miliband is exactly right to take them head-on.
China in the Lead? February 7, 2010 : 4:55 PM
This is why we need the Senate to pass a clean energy, climate and green jobs bill now:
"China vaulted past competitors in Denmark, Germany, Spain and the United States last year to become the world's largest maker of wind turbines, and is poised to expand even further this year."
"China has also leapfrogged the West in the last two years to emerge as the world's largest manufacturer of solar panels. And the country is pushing equally hard to build nuclear reactors and the most efficient types of coal power plants."
"These efforts to dominate renewable energy technologies raise the prospect that the West may someday trade its dependence on oil from the Mideast for a reliance on solar panels, wind turbines and other gear manufactured in China."
Want to See the Effects of Climate Change? February 1, 2010 : 1:00 PM
Recently the Huffington Post published a photo feature titled “Seeing the Effects of Climate Change."
“Sometimes as we go about our daily lives, climate change can seem abstract, and not something we think we are experiencing on a daily basis. However, our planet is rapidly being altered and the physical signs of this shift can't be ignored. These photos reveal how the world has already been impacted and what kind of changes we can expect in the future if we continue with our carbon-intense ways.”
The post contains photos of coastal erosion, the bleaching of coral reefs, melting glaciers and other catastrophes occurring around the globe. I urge you to send this to anyone who doubts that even minor changes in temperature have a huge effect on our planet.
Read This Editorial January 31, 2010 : 6:58 PM
The New York Times hit the nail on the head, writing:
"Washington has been forecasting the likely death of a climate bill with renewed certainty since Massachusetts elected a Republican senator who promised to block pretty much anything Mr. Obama wants. But even before then we were hearing two reasons why a bill could not pass: The Senate won’t have any strength left when it finishes with health care, and the nation cannot afford a bill that implies an increase in energy prices."
"The first reason is defeatist, the second greatly exaggerated. The climate change bills pending in the Senate would not begin to bite for several years, when the recession should be over. The cost to households, according to the Congressional Budget Office, would be small. A good program would create more jobs than it cost."
"The list of reasons to pass a climate bill, on the other hand, is long and persuasive."
The Right Political Move January 31, 2010 : 5:09 PM
Here are some amazing results from the Allstate/National Journal/Heartland Monitor poll:
Even more amazing is how Cap-and-Trade was described:
"A cap and trade system to address climate change by allowing government to set limits on the total amount of greenhouse gases that can be emitted nationally."
As Climate Progress pointed out:
“That’s right, people were asked about what is widely considered to be a straight political loser — “cap and trade to address climate change” — with no mention of the many benefits of the bill that typically poll far better — increasing energy independence, generating clean energy jobs, and reducing pollution.”
They go on to note:
"Poll after poll makes clear this bill is a winning political issue:"
"1. Swing state poll finds 60% “would be more likely to vote for their senator if he or she supported the bill” and Independents support the bill 2-to-1 (9/09)"
"2. New CNN poll finds “nearly six in 10 independents” support cap-and-trade (10/09)"
"3. Voters in Ohio, Michigan and Missouri overwhelmingly support action on clean energy and global warming (11/09)"
"4. Overwhelming US Public Support for Global Warming Action (12/09)"
"5. Public Opinion Stunner: WashPost-ABC Poll Finds Strong Support for Global Warming Reductions Despite Relentless Big Oil and Anti-Science Attacks (12/09)"
Solving the climate crisis is not only the right thing to do legislatively, it is also the right thing to do politically.
It's Official: 2000s Were the Hottest Decade on Record January 29, 2010 : 6:34 PM
Over the past few weeks, climate deniers have tried to promote a number of pseudo-scandals as evidence that the Earth is not warming. However, once again their assertions are contradicted by the facts:
“NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) released its final report on 2009 surface temperatures Thursday, concluding:”
“2009 was tied for the second warmest year in the modern record, a new NASA analysis of global surface temperature shows. The analysis, conducted by the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New York City, also shows that in the Southern Hemisphere, 2009 was the warmest year since modern records began in 1880….”
“January 2000 to December 2009 was the warmest decade on record. Throughout the last three decades, the GISS surface temperature record shows an upward trend of about 0.2°C (0.36°F) per decade.”
There is no doubt the planet is warming. Those trying to make the case that the climate crisis is not happening simply do not have the facts on their side.
Innovation and Insulation January 29, 2010 : 3:05 PM
Last week at the Huffington Post, Bill Gates asked the following question:
“Should society spend a lot of time trying to insulate houses and telling people to turn off lights or should it spend time on accelerating innovation?”
The fact is we need to do both. Innovation is essential, and Gates is absolutely correct when he writes:
“To achieve the kinds of innovations that will be required I think a distributed system of R&D with economic rewards for innovators and strong government encouragement is the key. There just isn't enough work going on today to get us to where we need to go.”
We need massive investment, by both the private sector and the government, in green energy technology. This is one of the reasons it’s so important that the Senate act immediately to pass the clean energy and green jobs bill. And I’ve long said, we need to change laws, not just light bulbs. However, with the climate crisis unfolding at a rapid pace, we cannot sacrifice immediate and easily achievable gains in energy efficiency. Right now we need to put our energy behind every possible solution to this crisis. There is no reason we can’t walk and chew gum at the same time if the will exists.
"Murkowski's Mischief" January 28, 2010 : 6:03 PM
The New York Times editorial page last week wrote:
“Senator Lisa Murkowski’s home state of Alaska is ever so slowly melting away, courtesy of a warming planet. Yet few elected officials seem more determined than she to throw sand in the Obama administration’s efforts to do something about climate change.”
“As part of an agreement that allowed the Senate to get out of town before Christmas, Democratic leaders gave Ms. Murkowski and several other Republicans the chance to offer amendments to a must-pass bill lifting the debt ceiling. Voting on that bill begins this week. Although she has not showed her hand, Ms. Murkowski has been considering various proposals related to climate change — all mischievous.”
We need to stop Lisa Murkowski’s attempt to gut the Clean Air Act cold in its tracks. That is why, if you haven’t already, I urge you to write your Senator today.
A Great Debate January 28, 2010 : 4:26 PM
Robert Kennedy Jr. recently debated Massey Energy CEO and climate crisis denier Don Blankenship.
There were several notable moments during the event. The first one happened when Kennedy addressed the scientific consensus behind the climate crisis:
“I have a choice of believing the 98 percent or the 2 percent,” Kennedy said. “If you believe my 98 percent and we go ahead and try to reduce our carbon, we’ve gotten rid of the dirty fuel, we’ve made ourselves energy independent, improved our national security, improved our prosperity and quality of life and health for American citizens. If we believe Mr. Blankenship and his 2 percent, and they’re wrong, the whole of civilization is destroyed.”
The second noteworthy exchange occurred on the issue of mountaintop-removal mining. Kennedy directly asked Blankenship:
“My question to you, and I know you’re an honest person, I want to ask you this question: Is it possible to do mountaintop removal mining without violating the law?”
Blankenship responded:
“I doubt it’s possible without having a single violation at a single time,”
